Politics: Are you mad at Democrats for supporting bush's wars?

Answer this question

  • Politics: Are you mad at Democrats for supporting bush's wars?


Answer #1 | 23/12 2013 05:02
Yes, but I'm even more mad at Republicans. They controlled the White House and had majority control of both houses of Congress.
Answer #2 | 23/12 2013 05:08
'FYI: I'm LIBERTARIAN,' sorry, buddy, you're a fool. Clinton DIDN'T allow him to develop WMD's by establishing a completely successful 'no-fly- zone, with the support of many nations. Bush trumped it all up with falsehoods and got 'support' for invading Iraq and seizing the oil fields - after he ignored the WRITTEN warning about Bin Laden given to him by Clinton. You can slice and dice it any way you please, but the fact is that we went to war for oil and lied to do it. The real threats were ignored. Live in your own reality. That's what fools do, don't they?
Answer #3 | 23/12 2013 05:05
Mad at Democrats, never.
Answer #4 | 23/12 2013 05:08
Answer #5 | 23/12 2013 05:12
It seems that, at the time, everybody was for both wars. In hindsight, I think we were SKROOOD by the M.I.C. Let's face it, the M.I.C. never warned us about either party but BOTH parties have warned us about them! .
Answer #6 | 23/12 2013 05:11
The Democrats went along because they trusted the intel that some deliberately knew was falsified. It was a dirty trick played on America. And we found no weapons.
Answer #7 | 23/12 2013 05:14
I didn't read your long post, it would be a waste of my time particularly when someone starts off bashing Bush who has not been in office for almost six years. By the way, the president we have now is a lot more dangerous to the US than any other we have ever had so wake up and smell the proverbial coffee.

Possible answer

Login to your account
Create new account