Interesting how people accuse the global warming alarmists with corruption, when the opposite is true: isn't it?

Answer this question

  • Interesting how people accuse the global warming alarmists with corruption, when the opposite is true: isn't it?


Answer #1 | 23/07 2014 17:10
This statement can be made from every perspective: East vs. West, North vs. South, Democrat vs. Republican, Conservative vs. Liberal. And as a statement it will almost always be partially true...and partially a load of propaganda. As to the topic specifically, my profession and experience have led me to agree that global warming is a reality, but my opinion is that the "global warming alarmists" are doing a terrible job of advancing and defending that message through sheer panic and arrogance.
Positive: 100 %
Answer #2 | 23/07 2014 17:08
How anyone can believe that the NGO scientists who work for nothing have a greater financial incentive to lie, than Big Oil scientist boggles the mind. If global warming is true, and we do act, we save the human race from untold hardship. If global warming is false, and we do act, we reduce our pollution levels and will force our industries to develop new energy sources, which we will need for space exploration anyway. If global warming is true, and we do not act, we will see famine, hunger, and death all over the world. If Global warming is false, and we do not act, we will continue to rely upon a limited amount of resources to fuel humankind's exponential need for energy, and we won't invest in renewable sources until we are in a true energy crisis (the world runs out of oil).
Answer #3 | 23/07 2014 17:12
The opposite would be to say that our government is angelic and would never pay someone off to lie for them.
Answer #4 | 23/07 2014 17:16
Either way ....somebody is going to be making EASY MONEY off this $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Do you love the smell of easy money?
Positive: 0 %
Answer #5 | 23/07 2014 17:18
When 97 out of a 100 people agree, I tend to go with the group instead of the greater fools. I'm such a conformist, besides, am I supposed to believe you and the hand full of oil company scientists or my own eyes?
Answer #6 | 23/07 2014 17:09
It works both ways... The scientists, politicians and news networks that go out of their way to support GW get massive donations from industries that PROFIT from global warming zealotry.
Answer #7 | 23/07 2014 17:22
You have made no effort to back up your claim, so the question is meaningless.
Answer #8 | 23/07 2014 17:08
The Koch Brothers hired the tobacco lobby scientists to prove climate change is a hoax!
Answer #9 | 23/07 2014 18:14
From what I've seen the LEFT isn't interested in creating an economically viable solution. They want everyone else to live the 3rd world life style while they increase their carbon footprint. They are great Whiners. If they really have "Superior Intellect" why do they not use it to create a solution that money grubbing conservatives will buy into? You know conservatives are easily manipulated by profit & the quicker it comes the better!
Positive: 0 %
Answer #10 | 23/07 2014 17:07
Pretty much. They even refuse to acknowledge the fact that the people who do "peer review" do so in a biased manner to suppress threat to the gravy train for climate "research".
Answer #11 | 23/07 2014 17:07
The politicians that deny it also just happen to get massive donations from big oil companies. Same with the NEWS NETWORKS that deny it. There's a huge profit to be made driving humanity over a cliff.
Answer #12 | 23/07 2014 17:08
if you have a group that's large enough, you're going to have some corruption... the general issue is if that corruption sets the agenda... I don't know how corrupt the other side is, they seem to be pretty open about cheering for oil companies?

Possible answer