FIND THE ANSWERS

Are liberals lazy moochers who will vote for whomever promises to tax the rich the most to give them free stuff?

Answer this question

  • Are liberals lazy moochers who will vote for whomever promises to tax the rich the most to give them free stuff?


Answers

Answer #1 | 22/09 2016 01:04
Liberals are lazy moochers. But its even worse than that. They are stupid lazy moochers. Democrats have been promising them the SOS for decades, never come through with it, and these STUPID LAZY MOOCHERS keep lapping up liberal lies, like a dog licks his A hole!!!
Positive: 100 %
Answer #2 | 22/09 2016 00:44
Most of them are. Liberals are short term here and now type of people who could care less about the future, unless it involves the environment. But generally, they're too stuck up to see past their noses at the adverse results that follow after their actions.
Positive: 80 %
Answer #3 | 21/09 2016 18:46
the real moochers are those who rake in hundreds of times what a minimum-wage worker gets
Positive: 75 %
Anonymous993973 | 22/10 2017 19:59
yep, the dems have lazy moochers their property as they vote democratic. proof of stupidity!
Positive: 66.666666666667 %
Anonymous993973 | 22/10 2017 20:06
yeah, and everyone deserves a trophy for competing. get real!
Positive: 50 %
Anonymous993973 | 22/10 2017 20:03
spoken like a true democratic!
Positive: 50 %
Answer #7 | 22/09 2016 01:46
the real moochers are those who rake in hundreds of times what a minimum-wage worker gets
Positive: 50 %
Answer #8 | 21/09 2016 23:55
Yes
Positive: 50 %
Answer #9 | 22/09 2016 00:41
More or less.
Positive: 50 %
Answer #10 | 21/09 2016 23:56
You do realize in the USA if you make a substantial amount of money you're actually entitled to a TAX BREAK. Thats what we're fighting for.
Positive: 50 %
Answer #11 | 21/09 2016 17:44
Most of them are. Liberals are short term here and now type of people who could care less about the future, unless it involves the environment. But generally, they're too stuck up to see past their noses at the adverse results that follow after their actions.
Positive: 50 %
Answer #12 | 21/09 2016 16:56
Capitalism creates poverty
Positive: 50 %
Answer #13 | 21/09 2016 17:41
More or less.
Positive: 50 %
Answer #14 | 21/09 2016 16:56
You do realize in the USA if you make a substantial amount of money you're actually entitled to a TAX BREAK. Thats what we're fighting for.
Positive: 50 %
Answer #15 | 21/09 2016 16:55
Yes
Positive: 50 %
Answer #16 | 21/09 2016 16:56
Work will never support the population- never has. But it EMPOWERS the war-mongering elite far too much to wage slave without a welfare state.
Positive: 50 %
Anonymous993973 | 22/10 2017 20:08
please explain the stupid liberal response
Positive: 50 %
Answer #18 | 21/09 2016 18:04
Liberals are lazy moochers. But its even worse than that. They are stupid lazy moochers. Democrats have been promising them the SOS for decades, never come through with it, and these STUPID LAZY MOOCHERS keep lapping up liberal lies, like a dog licks his A hole!!!
Positive: 50 %
Answer #19 | 21/09 2016 23:56
Capitalism creates poverty
Positive: 42.857142857143 %
Answer #20 | 21/09 2016 17:13
No. Liberals understand that societies create wealth, and therefor wealth should be shared equitably. Societies with maldistribution of wealth collapse from the internal contradictions of flows of wealth from the many to the few. It results in financial collapse, economic crisis, and social decay. You wouldn't have to "give people free stuff" if there was equitable distribution of wealth. Welfare (social insurance) is a remedy for capitalist failure, not the cause of capitalist failure. If capitalism actually worked to promote the general welfare, you wouldn't even know what a government is because they wouldn't be needed, nor exist.
Positive: 25 %
Answer #21 | 22/09 2016 00:13
No. Liberals understand that societies create wealth, and therefor wealth should be shared equitably. Societies with maldistribution of wealth collapse from the internal contradictions of flows of wealth from the many to the few. It results in financial collapse, economic crisis, and social decay. You wouldn't have to "give people free stuff" if there was equitable distribution of wealth. Welfare (social insurance) is a remedy for capitalist failure, not the cause of capitalist failure. If capitalism actually worked to promote the general welfare, you wouldn't even know what a government is because they wouldn't be needed, nor exist.
Positive: 25 %
Answer #22 | 21/09 2016 23:56
Work will never support the population- never has. But it EMPOWERS the war-mongering elite far too much to wage slave without a welfare state.
Positive: 20 %
Answer #23 | 22/09 2016 00:28
Wats wrong with mooching?
Positive: 20 %
Answer #24 | 21/09 2016 17:28
Wats wrong with mooching?
Positive: 0 %

Possible answer