hunger games better than catching fire. (opinion)?

Answer this question

  • hunger games better than catching fire. (opinion)?


Answer #1 | 23/12 2013 01:05
Yep the first one was more realistic instead of a fancy arena. And it wasn't a cliff hanger.
Positive: 33 %
Answer #2 | 23/12 2013 01:07
Yes, I have the same opinion as yours. Huger games was full of suspense and was much more interesting than catching fire
Positive: 27 %
Answer #3 | 23/12 2013 02:46
I guess because I didn't read the books and I don't intend to, I'm excited to see how it's going to turn out. I loved the first one so much that I eagerly waited for the second one and loved it just the same. But I get what you all mean.
Positive: 7 %
Answer #4 | 23/12 2013 09:25
No. The second was more like the book and they improved about everything from the first.
Positive: 10 %
Answer #5 | 24/12 2013 15:49
I like the effects in the 2nd one and the amazon girl was awesome. They were both pretty good.
Positive: 10 %

Possible answer

Review: 'Hunger Games: Catching Fire' better than the original. ... To top it all it all off, President Snow announces the 75th Hunger Games ...
Read more
Positive: 33 %
Debates > The Hunger Games vs Divergent ... I liked the action in the hunger Games better than in ... Then I read Catching Fire and Mockingjay and they ...
Read more
Positive: 28 %
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire ... Catching Fire is bigger, better and broodier than the first film. 75. ... The Hunger Games: Catching Fire Opinion.
Read more
Positive: 14 %
Catching Fire (The Second Book of the Hunger Games) 14,938. Suzanne ... ground breaking New York Times bestsellers The Hunger Games and Catching Fire, ...
Read more
Positive: 10 %

Show more results