hunger games better than catching fire. (opinion)?

Answer this question

  • hunger games better than catching fire. (opinion)?


Answer #1 | 23/12 2013 01:05
Yep the first one was more realistic instead of a fancy arena. And it wasn't a cliff hanger.
Positive: 33 %
Answer #2 | 23/12 2013 01:07
Yes, I have the same opinion as yours. Huger games was full of suspense and was much more interesting than catching fire
Positive: 27 %
Answer #3 | 23/12 2013 02:46
I guess because I didn't read the books and I don't intend to, I'm excited to see how it's going to turn out. I loved the first one so much that I eagerly waited for the second one and loved it just the same. But I get what you all mean.
Positive: 7 %
Answer #4 | 23/12 2013 09:25
No. The second was more like the book and they improved about everything from the first.
Positive: 10 %
Answer #5 | 24/12 2013 15:49
I like the effects in the 2nd one and the amazon girl was awesome. They were both pretty good.
Positive: 10 %

Possible answer

Opinion. Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Kidnapped. ... Hunger Games: Catching Fire. ... more deadly than the last. ...
Read more
Positive: 33 %
Report Abuse Home > Opinion > Pop Culture / Trends > Hunger Games: A Writer's Review ... There’s nothing better than to read a good ... Catching Fire and ...
Read more
Positive: 28 %
Fox 411 movie critic Justin Craig reviews 'The Hunger Games: Catching Fire' and Judi ... Opinion; Entertainment; Sports ... 'Catching Fire' better than ...
Read more
Positive: 14 %
The Hunger Games book review covers the ... it is best suited for teens and adults rather than ... Catching Fire: Book 2 in the Hunger Games ...
Read more
Positive: 10 %

Show more results